We should change our study pettern

Now start with some questions
 1) Was Purtgali sailor Vasco-Da-Gama discover the sea route to India?
 2) Was Greek philosopher Pythagoras 1st to explain the Pythagoras Theorem?
 3) Was Marconi invented the Wireless Radio Transmission in 1901?
 4) Was first test tube baby born Louise Brown in UK?
 5) Was number system called an Arabic number?


I know you all give your answers in “YES” I say these all are wrong that means all answers in “NO”. You all think how it is possible but it’s true.

Let’s talk about first question. Vasco-Da-Gama start the searching of sea route to India from Europe and when he reached the cost of Africa he got his ship damage and he decided to go back to Europe at that time he found a big ship on the cost that is triple his ship. He send the one person to enquiry of that and he found that ship of the gujrati sailor who came to here for business then the Vasco-Da-Gama told that gujrati sailor to hold him with them to reach India. And the gujrati sailor toeing his ship with own ship and came to the India. After that the king of Kerla gifted the three ships to the Vasco-Da-Gama and he return to Europe. After sometime the came again with some force and league for do business here.


Let’s talk about second question. The Greek Philosopher Pythagoras was the student of Takshashila University and he learned all mathematic from here. The Pythagoras theorem is copy of the Budhayan Sutra of Vedas.

Now aspect of third question it is absolutely wrong that Marconi invented the Wireless Radio Transmission in 1901. Befour it mr.Jagdeesh chandra basu was invented it marconi was only patent of this from very small viellege of U.S. 

साध्वी नहीं, कटघरे में है एटीएस/कांग्रेस / मीडिया

पहली बार हिंदू आतंकवादी गिरोह का भंडाफोड़ कर इतिहास में अपना नाम दर्ज कराने के मंसूबे पालने वाला महाराष्ट्र पुलिस का आतंकवाद निरोधी दस्ता अब अपने ही बुने जाल में फंसता जा रहा है। यही कारण है कि एटीएस अब वैज्ञानिक जांच के नतीजों को अवैज्ञानिक और भोथरे दलीलों से झुठलाने की कोशिश कर रहा है।

गौर करने की बात ये है कि जिस मालेगांव विस्फोट में साध्वी को दोषी ठहराया जा रहा है वह पहली घटना नहीं है. इसके पहले भी 2006 में मालेगांव की मस्जिद के बाहर विस्फोट हो चुका है, जिसमें कई लोग मारे गए थे। इस विस्फोट की जांच भी महाराष्ट्र पुलिस ने की थी लेकिन उसकी जांच पर जब सवालिया निशान लग गया तो जांच सीबीआई को सौंप दी गई। पिछले तीन साल से सीबीआई की स्पेशल टास्क फोर्स इसकी जांच कर रही है। ये वही स्पेशल टास्क फोर्स है, जिसने 1993 के मुंबई बम धमाकों की जांच की थी और इसी जांच के आधार पर इसके लिए लगभग 117 आरोपियों की मुंबई की विशेष अदालत ने सजा भी सुना दी। लेकिन अभी तक मालेगांव विस्फोट की जांच का कोई नतीजा नहीं निकला है। 

इसी साल जून महीने में मैंने जब सीबीआई के एक वरिष्ठ अधिकारी, जो अब रिटायर हो चुके हैं, से इस जांच की स्थिति के बारे में जानना चाहा तो उनका कहना था कि इसकी जांच में कोई खास प्रगति नहीं हो पाई है और उनका ये भी कहना था प्रारंभिक जांच ये जरूर पता चलता है कि इस विस्फोट के पीछे भी उन्हीं लोगों का हाथ है जिन्होंने हैदराबाद की मक्का मस्जिद समेत देश के विभिन्न शहरों में विस्फोटों को अंजाम दिया है। मजे की बात ये है कि मालेगांव की ताजा विस्फोट के लिए प्रज्ञा सिंह ठाकुर की गिरफ्तारी के बाद सीबीआई का कोई अधिकारी इस मामले में बोलने के लिए तैयार नहीं है। एटीएस (एन्टी टेरेरिस्ट स्क्वाड) साध्वी के खिलाफ मिले सबूतों और उसकी ब्रेनमैपिंग व नार्कों टेस्ट के नतीजों को सार्वजनिक करने के बजाय अब साध्वी की साधना की आड़ लेकर अपनी गलतियों को छुपाने की कोशिश कर रहा है।

एक बात और जिस समय मालेगांव में विस्फोट हुआ उसी समय गुजरात के मोडासा में भी विस्फोट हुआ। खुफिया एजेंसियों का तब कहना था कि इन दोनों विस्फोटों के पीछे एक ही आतंकवादी संगठन का हाथ है। लेकिन गुजरात पुलिस ने प्रज्ञा सिंह ठाकुर और अन्य आरोपियों से पूछताछ के बाद दो दिन पहले साफ कर दिया कि मोडासा विस्फोटों में इस गिरोह के हाथ के सबूत नहीं मिले हैं।

स्वाभाविक है कि इसे मोदी सरकार की हिंदू आतंकवादियों को बचाने की चाल कह कर खारिज किया जा सकता है। लेकिन यूपीए सरकार के तहत काम करने वाली सीबीआई पर इस तरह का आरोप नहीं लगाया जा सकता। फिर सीबीआई इस मामले में चुप क्यों है? जबकि साफ है कि मालेगांव में हुए दोनों विस्फोटों के पीछे उद्देश्य और विस्फोट करने का तरीका एक ही है तो फिर सीबीआई प्रज्ञा सिंह ठाकुर से पूछताछ करने की कोशिश क्यों नहीं कर रही है? ये बड़ा सवाल है और इस सवाल का जबाव ढूंढने में ही साध्वी की गिरफ्तारी और कथित हिंदू आतंकवाद के खुलासे के पीछे छुपे राजनीतिक छल-प्रपंच का भंडाफोड़ हो पाएगा.

जिस तरह से मालेगांव में हुए विस्फोट में सिर्फ साध्वी के नाम पर रजिस्टर्ड मोटरसाइकिल के आधार पर उसे हिंदू आतंकवादी करार दे दिया गया और मीडिया ट्रायल के द्वारा इसे सही साबित करने की कोशिश की गई उससे साफ हो गया कि एटीएस के पास साध्वी के खिलाफ कोई ठोस सबूत नहीं है। कोशिश ये की गई कि मुंबई की ही फॉरेंसिक लेबोरेटरी में ही साध्वी की ब्रेन मैपिंग कराकर इसे साध्वी के खिलाफ उपयोग किया जाए। वरना नार्को या ब्रेन मैपिग के लिए मुंबई की फॉरेसिक लेबोरेटरी का कोई खास स्थान नहीं है। इसके लिए सबसे अच्छी लेबोरेटरी बेंगलोर की मानी जाती है। सीबीआई सभी अहम मामलों में ये जांच वहीं कराती रही है। फिर दुनिया के पहले हिंदू आतंकवादियों की ब्रेन मैपिग और नार्को मुंबई की फॉरेंसिक लैब में कराने के पीछे क्या राज हो सकता है? वैसे एटीएस को इसमें भी सफलता नहीं मिली है। फिलहाल साध्वी सभी वैज्ञानिक जांचों में बेदाग निकल गई हैं। अब एटीएस दोबारा से परीक्षण की बात कह रहा है. 

इस मामले में बुरी तरह फंस चुकी एटीएस इसे साध्वी की साधना का कमाल बता रही है। जबकि एटीएस के अधिकारियों को ये तो मालूम ही होगा कि सिर्फ नार्को या ब्रेन मैपिंग के आधार पर किसी के दोषी नहीं ठहराया जा सकता, वरना सीबीआई आरूषि हत्याकांड में कृष्णा और राजकुमार के खिलाफ कब का चार्जशीट दाखिल कर देती। खैर एटीएस को तो प्रज्ञा सिंह ठाकुर के खिलाफ ये भी नहीं मिला है। जाहिर अब थोथी दलीलों के आधार पर एटीएस अपना बचाव करने की कोशिश करने लगी है

150th Birth Year Of JAGDISH CHANDRA BOSE

Born: November 30, 1858
Died: November 23, 1937
Achievements: He was the first to prove that plants and metals too have feelings. He invented wireless telegraphy a year before Marconi patented his invention.

Jagdish Chandra Bose was an eminent Indian scientist. He was the first to prove that plants and metals too have feelings.

Jagdish Chandra Bose was born on November 30, 1858 in Mymensingh (now in Bangladesh). His father Bhagabanchandra Bose was a Deputy Magistrate. Jagadish Chandra Bose had his early education in village school in Bengal medium. In 1869, Jagadish Chandra Bose was sent to Calcutta to learn English and was educated at St.Xavier's School and College. He was a brilliant student. He passed the B.A. in physical sciences in 1879.

In 1880, Jagdishchandra Bose went to England. He studied medicine at London University, England, for a year but gave it up because of his own ill health. Within a year he moved to Cambridge to take up a scholarship to study Natural Science at Christ's College Cambridge. In 1885, he returned from abroad with a B.Sc. degree and Natural Science Tripos (a special course of study at Cambridge).

After his return Jagadish Chandra Bose, was offered lectureship at Presidency College, Calcutta on a salary half that of his English colleagues. He accepted the job but refused to draw his salary in protest. After three years the college ultimately conceded his demand and Jagdish Chandra Bose was paid full salary from the date he joined the college. As a teacher Jagdish Chandra Bose was very popular and engaged the interest of his students by making extensive use of scientific demonstrations. Many of his students at the Presidency College were destined to become famous in their own right. These included Satyendra Nath Bose and Meghnad Saha.

In 1894, Jagadish Chandra Bose decided to devote himself to pure research. He converted a small enclosure adjoining a bathroom in the Presidency College into a laboratory. He carried out experiments involving refraction, diffraction and polarization. It would not be wrong to call him as the inventor of wireless telegraphy. In 1895, a year before Guglielmo Marconi patented this invention, he had demonstrated its functioning in public.

Jagdish Chandra Bose later switched from physics to the study of metals and then plants. He fabricated a highly sensitive "coherer", the device that detects radio waves. He found that the sensitivity of the coherer decreased when it was used continuously for a long period and it regained its sensitivity when he gave the device some rest. He thus concluded that metals have feelings and memory.

Jagdish Chandra Bose showed experimentally plants too have life. He invented an instrument to record the pulse of plants and connected it to a plant. The plant, with its roots, was carefully picked up and dipped up to its stem in a vessel containing bromide, a poison. The plant's pulse beat, which the instrument recorded as a steady to-and-fro movement like the pendulum of a clock, began to grow unsteady. Soon, the spot vibrated violently and then came to a sudden stop. The plant had died because of poison.

Although Jagdish Chandra Bose did invaluable work in Science, his work was recognized in the country only when the Western world recognized its importance. He founded the Bose Institute at Calcutta, devoted mainly to the study of plants. Today, the Institute carries research on other fields too.

Jagdish Chandra Bose died on November 23, 1937.

India has World's 1/3rd poors

India is home to roughly one-third of all poor people in the world. It also has a higher proportion of its population living on less than $2 per day than even sub-Saharan Africa. That is the sobering news coming out of the World Bank’s latest estimates on global poverty. 

The fine print of the estimates also shows that the rate of decline of poverty in India was faster between 1981 and 1990 than it has been between 1990 and 2005. This finding is likely to give fresh ammunition to those who maintain that economic reforms, which started in 1991, have failed to reduce poverty at a faster rate. 

India, according to the new estimates, had 456 million people or about 42% of the population living below the new international poverty line of $1.25 per day. The number of Indian poor also constitute 33% of the global poor, which is pegged at 1.4 billion people. 

India also had 828 million people, or 75.6% of the population living below $2 a day. Sub-Saharan Africa, considered the world’s poorest region, is better — it has 72.2% of its population or 551 million people below the $2 a day level. 

The estimates are based on recently recalculated purchasing power parity (PPP) exchange rates, which makes comparisons across countries possible. The dollar exchange rates being referred to here, therefore, are not the ones used in normal exchange rates. 

While the full report has not yet been released, a briefing note sent by the Bank had some of the data and what that showed was that the poverty rate — those below $1.25 per day — for India had come down from 59.8% in 1981 to 51.3% by 1990 or 8.5 percentage points over nine years. Between 1990 and 2005, it declined to 41.6%, a drop of 9.7 percentage points over 15 years, clearly a much slower rate of decline.

An FAQ on the new estimates, also provided by the Bank, makes no mention of this and states that, “India has maintained even progress against poverty since the 1980s, with the poverty rate declining at a little under one percentage point per year.” 

The note does point out that while India had 421 million below the $1.25-a-day mark in 1981, that number had gone up not down to 456 million by 2005. Thus, while there has been a decline in the poverty ratio, the ranks of the poor are still swelling. 
The new international poverty line of $1.25 PPP per day has been arrived at as “the average poverty line found in the poorest 10-20 countries”, according to the briefing note. In other words, more than four out of 10 Indians lives below what the world’s poorest countries consider the poverty line. 

The new estimates are sobering not just for India but for the developing world as a whole, as they reveal higher levels of poverty than earlier estimated. 
For instance, even in China’s case, they suggest that 208 million people or 16% of the population is below the new international poverty line rather than the 130 million estimated earlier. However, that is still a sharp decline from the 730 million (84%) that were poor in that country in 1981. 

East Asia, in fact, is the region that has recorded the sharpest reductions in poverty from about 79% of the population in 1981 to 18% in 2005. In contrast, Eastern Europe and Central Asia — broadly the former Soviet bloc — has seen poverty rates go up from 1.6% to 5%. What is noticeable in this region is the decline in poverty till 1987, when it was down to just 1% of the population, and the sharp rise subsequently.

For Sub-Saharan Africa, the worrying sign is that poverty rates are virtually unchanged from 1981, which is why the Bank estimates that by 2015, this region could be home to one-third of the world’s poor. 

The Bank also makes the point that while raising people above the poverty line is a relatively achievable task — it believes poverty levels in 1990 can be halved by 2015 — it is proving very difficult to raise them above the $2 per day mark. The number of those in the developing world below this level has in fact gone up marginally from 2.5 billion to 2.6 billion since 1981